2016 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2015 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2014 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
Listed here in Ascending Date Order by Date Posted to FERC eLibrary.
NOTE: The Docket List on the FERC website is in Date Order by Date Filed, rather than by Date Posted.
Color Key: | Project Developer, Contractors & Supporters Project Opponents Project Neutral Unknown, non-public comments |
Listed here in Ascending Date Order by Posted Date, rather than by Filed Date to FERC eLibrary.
NOTE: The Docket List on the FERC website is in Date Order by Date Filed, rather than by Date Posted.
Aug 1 | Filed By: Downeast LNG, Inc. Summary: DeLNG claims the Passamaquoddy have no rights in the marine waterway, disputing Save Passamaquoddy Bay's 2014 July 21 comment to the formal docket. |
Aug 4 | Filed By: Save Passamaquoddy Bay Summary: SPB points out FERC's and Downeast LNG's environmental justice violations re Passamaquody Tribal rights. |
Aug 7 | Issued By: ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF [FERC] Summary: The schedule for EIS review has been SUSPENDED, due to Downeast LNG's change in plans to amend their FIRST application (the import application) to add Exporting, rather than a second application that they have already Pre-filed to do. |
Aug 11 | Issued By: ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE Of [FERC] Summary: FERC indicates that once Pre-filing is completed, the proposed Downeast LNG Export Project will be formally processed within the existing CP07-52, CP07-53, and CP07-53-001 dockets. In addition — and disturbingly — FERC indicates that the export project environmental document will be a "supplement" to the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) previously issued for the import project. FERC has failed its public interest responsibilities by not correcting the plethora of significant, and sometimes intentional, flaws in the original EIS. |
Aug 12 | Filed By: Save Passamaquoddy Bay |