2016 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2015 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2014 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
Listed here in Ascending Date Order by Date Posted to FERC eLibrary.
NOTE: The Docket List on the FERC website is in Date Order by Date Filed, rather than by Date Posted.
Color Key: | Project Developer, Contractors & Supporters Project Opponents Project Neutral Unknown, non-public comments |
Listed here in Ascending Date Order by Posted Date, rather than by Filed Date to FERC eLibrary.
NOTE: The Docket List on the FERC website is in Date Order by Date Filed, rather than by Date Posted.
Jan 2 | Filed By: ROOSEVELT CAMPOBELLO INTERNATIONAL PARK COMMISSION [Note: This comment was filed on 2014 Dec 29, and is listed under that date on the FERC docket; however, it did not appear on the docket until 2015 Jan 2.] Summary: Roosevelt Campobello International Park provides numerous reasons why it opposes the proposed Downeast LNG import and export terminal. |
Jan 9 | Filed By: Save Passamaquoddy Bay Summary: SPB demonstrates the lack of need for Downeast LNG. |
Jan 14 | Filed By: Downeast Liquefaction, LLC Downeast LNG, Inc. Downeast Pipeline, LLC Webmaster's comment: Resulting from Save Passamaquoddy Bay's inquiry as to what Non-Public subject matter was being addressed in the above Downeast LNG filing, FERC determined that the filing is identical to the subsequent Public Downeast LNG filing, and added the "Erroneously filed" text to the filing's description. Filed By: Downeast Liquefaction, LLC Downeast LNG, Inc. Downeast Pipeline, LLC Summary: The following are reported on, along with other information —
|
Jan 21 | Issued By: ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF [FERC] Summary: FERC asks the Department of Defense if the proposed Downeast LNG terminal would impact testing, training, or operations of any military installation. |
Jan 26 | Issued By: ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF [FERC] Webmaster's comment: Inviting tribal participation in FERC permitting is window dressing, and is no indication that FERC will take tribal cultural and religious issues into consideration. Issued By: ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF [FERC] Webmaster's comment: Inviting regional tribal participation in FERC permitting is no indication that FERC will take tribal cultural and religious issues into consideration — as has been proven by FERC totally ignoring the religious and cultural assets sitting squarely beneath Downeast LNG's proposed terminal site. Issued By: ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF [FERC] Webmaster's comment: Inviting regional tribal participation in FERC permitting is no indication that FERC will take tribal cultural and religious issues into consideration — as has been proven by FERC totally ignoring the religious and cultural assets sitting squarely beneath Downeast LNG's proposed terminal site. Issued By: ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF [FERC] Webmaster's comment: Inviting regional tribal participation in FERC permitting is no indication that FERC will take tribal cultural and religious issues into consideration — as has been proven by FERC totally ignoring the religious and cultural assets sitting squarely beneath Downeast LNG's proposed terminal site. Issued By: ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF [FERC] Webmaster's comment: Inviting regional tribal participation in FERC permitting is no indication that FERC will take tribal cultural and religious issues into consideration — as has been proven by FERC totally ignoring the religious and cultural assets sitting squarely beneath Downeast LNG's proposed terminal site. |
Jan 27 | Filed By: Save Passamaquoddy Bay Summary: SPB has demonstrated that FERC's invitiation to the Aroostook Band of Micmacs is disingenuous. Filed By: Save Passamaquoddy Bay Summary: SPB has demonstrated that FERC's invitiation to the Houlton Band of Maliseets is disingenuous. Filed By: Save Passamaquoddy Bay Summary: SPB has demonstrated that FERC's invitiation to the Passamaquoddy Tribe is disingenuous. Filed By: Save Passamaquoddy Bay Summary: SPB has demonstrated that FERC's invitiation to the Penobscot Nation is disingenuous. Filed By: Save Passamaquoddy Bay Summary: FERC entirely failed to invite the Saint Croix Schoodic Band of Passamaquoddy to participate in these proceedings — the second time FERC has omitted notifying Canadians of Downeast LNG's proposal to add LNG exporting. In its omissions, FERC is establishing an alarming, inexcusable pattern of NEPA violations that it must correct immediately:
|