Loading
|
|
"For much of the state of Maine, the environment is the economy" |
2016 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2015 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2014 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2013 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2012 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2011 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2010 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2009 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2008 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2007 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2006 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2005 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2003 2004 | |
30 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: Arthur Gelber is demonstrating a surprising lack of industry acumen. Simply put, there is no need for Gelber's proposal, as indicated by realities in the LNG industry. LNG import infrastructure is already being overbuilt, imports are low, and foreign competition for LNG is winning.
Webmaster's Comments: This expansion of the Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, to carry Deep Panuke natural gas to the New England market area along with Canaport, Northeast Gateway, Neptune LNG, and MapleLNG is why the Calais LNG, Downeast LNG, and Quoddy Bay LNG projects are futile excersizes in wasting investors' and taxpayers' money.
Gas futures need to rise further to attract liquefied natural gas imports to help boost U.S supplies, said Beutel, who estimates prices need to reach $14.00/MMBtu to start attracting additional LNG. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: Globalization of LNG is pairing natural gas prices to equivalent oil prices, based on BTU (heat) output. LNG is causing natural gas prices to increase, not decrease, despite LNG developer hype to the public.
Webmaster's Comments: Author US Navy Reserve Lieutenant Commander Cindy Hurst is a political-military research analyst with the Foreign Military Studies Office.
Greater dependency on LNG decreases our energy security and economic security.
28 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: States' authority trumps FERC's "put LNG terminals anywhere and everywhere, safety-be-damned" philosophy.
The one-page decision is signed by J. Mark Robinson, director of the office on energy products.
When the Department overrides a state objection, federal agencies may proceed with normal permit and license processes for the project. The project will also be required to comply with all state and local permitting regulations, and complete all required environmental reviews. [Red & bold emphasis added.] (Jun 27)
He said the siting process for the LNG terminal requires a local land-use compatibility process.
The pipeline doesn't. (Jun 27)
The flow of liquefied natural gas (LNG) into the U.S. this year will probably be about 30 per cent less than the 770 billion cubic feet recorded in 2007, the Energy Department said June 10. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: Considering the economic and infrastructure realities in the natural gas and LNG industry, the financial outlook for proposed but unpermitted US LNG import terminals is downright dreadful.
27 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: COL Feir is now the officer in charge of the Army Corps of Engineers projects in the Passamaquoddy Bay region.
Webmaster's Comments: No matter how bad the project, FERC is determined to allow it to fester and to cost taxpayers.
Webmaster's Comments: This kind of bad news is what Downeast LNG, Calais LNG, and Quoddy Bay LNG have to look forward to if they continue their ill-planned projects.
"Latin America is starting to affect us. They've been pulling LNG from Trinidad that most likely would have come here," Johnson said. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: CLNG apparently hasn't been reading industry analysis reporting all the new domestic natural gas finds, and that the LNG import infrastructure is already considerably overbuilt.
We are in a global environment and our actions should reflect that reality.
[I]t is my view that we must recalibrate our focus on the following major areas:
- We must develop more traditional energy supplies from a greater diversity of sources.
- We must have more energy options through the development of technology.
- We have to substantially increase energy efficiency.
- From a technology standpoint, we should promote development of low carbon and no carbon technologies.
- We must improve the Nation’s energy infrastructure and better secure it from purposeful and inadvertent disruptions.
26 Jun 2008 |
"[I]f Weaver’s Cove is going to persist in pushing this idea, it’s going to have to come up with a response plan that suits our needs, and it better not expect that work to be funded by the people whose lives and property it plans to put at risk.” [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 25)
Webmaster's Comments: This may be a good model for other states and communities, to level out the bargaining balance that is currently all on the LNG developer's side.
Webmaster's Comments: Michael Day Sr. is assuming too much. The federal government can't simply dictate where these facilities will be; LNG terminal siting requires permits from several federal and state agencies.
TopWebmaster's Comments: LNG global commodification may be driving natural gas prices through the roof not keeping natural gas prices down for consumers, as LNG developers have been preaching.
24 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: Accidents happen, even to experienced, competent people.
Webmaster's Comments: The US Department of State's courting of Russia's gas monopoly Gazprom into owning US energy infrastructure is working, but is an insane method of obtaining "energy independence and security."
Webmaster's Comments: Another offshore LNG terminal with shipping traffic and LNG ships' berths safely away from the public, unlike all three of the LNG proposals for Passamaquoddy Bay.
- The impact of the offshore berth and LNG ship traffic on other Mount Hope Bay users, including fishing and recreational boaters.
- Safety issues relating to LNG ship traffic at the berth and LNG transfer pipelines.
- Potential impacts on residents in the project area, including safety issues at the berth, noise, air quality, and visual resources.
- Project impacts on marine resources and their associated habitats, including dredging impacts.
[I]t appears that the rush to construct new receiving terminals may not bring the immediate benefits that their owners expect. [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 23)
Webmaster's Comments: The news continues to be bad for Quoddy Bay LNG, Downeast LNG, and Calais LNG.
Webmaster's Comments: What FERC has actually done by this approach is waste a lot of companies’, communities’, and taxpayers’ money on poorly-sited proposals. Regional siting makes the most economic sense.
TopWebmaster's Comments: The letter's writer, proclaiming to be a British seaman, claims to know more about potential terrorist threat, the physics of a large LNG spill on water and potential ensuing fire, and such a fire's thermal effects on nearby civilians, than do the experts in the US government's employ. He claims that it's the US unions who are at fault for the anti-LNG sentiment. Luckily, this guy isn't making the safety and regulatory decisions for any government. Perhaps unluckily, he's apparently working on an LNG ship.
20 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: This demonstrates that Emergency Response Plans aren't developed until after FERC issues a permit to construct. That means the affected communities are dealing blind regarding the developers' Emergency Response Cost-sharing Plan that is approved long before FERC issues a permit to construct.
7. Boston: Arrest in Lasing LNG Tanker Helicopter Escort
Read the full story:
Medford man charged with lasing LNG tanker helicopter escort and making false statements Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston, MA
…it ran the risk of startling, distracting, disorienting, and even temporarily blinding the helicopter pilots at distances of up to three miles. [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 18)
Hickel believes the state should pursue a drastic change in course.
Webmaster's Comments: The US is importing LNG, but Alaska wants to export more of it to Asia? LNG is all about making money not what's best for Americans or the US economy.
According to the deed, the road was dedicated "to have and to hold ... unto the public forever."
"One of the essential prerequisites for submission of an LNG terminal project to FERC is demonstrable site control," he wrote in his letter. [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 19)
Webmaster's Comments: The problem described sounds a lot like some of the problems being encountered by Downeast LNG (the terminal exclusion zone engulfing US-1 in Robbinston) and Quoddy Bay LNG (cryogenic LNG pipeline crossing ME Rt-190 at Sipayik and Old Eastport Rd. in Perry).
The growth of import terminals will outpace the rise in LNG supplies to a point where global regasificaton plant capacity is more than double LNG production by the end of 2010, Bernstein said. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: This points out the price fiction being told by US LNG developers, who claim that importing LNG will reduce the price of natural gas.
19 Jun 2008 |
FERC approved yesterday Calais LNG's request to use the Commission's Pre-Filing process.
Webmaster's Comments: This demonstrates how easily LNG security escorts can be disabled or distracted from their duties, jeopardizing the LNG vessel security. This is one more reason why LNG ship transits and LNG terminals should not be located where they can endanger civilian populations. (See SIGTTO and LNG Terminal Siting Standards Organization.)
Webmaster's Comments: The US depending on a Russian natural gas monopoly is US energy security insanity. (See The future is in the pipeline, below.)
The unanswerable question is whether the Kremlin -- or more precisely, Vladimir Putin -- will use gas as a weapon to gain international political influence. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: See Gazprom examining ExxonMobil's offer to participate in proposed BlueOcean LNG project, above.
Webmaster's Comments: Waterborne Energy has made it clear: US LNG imports are driven by profit, not necessity. FERC's justification of LNG terminals anywhere and everywhere is as expected catering to big business, not to the public interest.
Top
18 Jun 2008 |
The country has one of the world’s largest supplies of natural gas.
Webmaster's Comments: Now that its permits are in place, Maple LNG is negotiating for LNG supply. Quoddy Bay LNG would have the public believe that they, too, are currently arranging for their own LNG supply, even without the required permits an unlikely event, especially considering the tight LNG supply worldwide.
Webmaster's Comments: Weaver's Cove LNG proposal is just as cockamamie as Quoddy Bay LNG's proposal. Both propose:
- Lengthy underwater cryogenic LNG pipelines;
- Berthing LNG tankers near to, and exposed to, the shipping transit lane;
- Berthing LNG ships where they would present hazards to neighboring civilian populations;
- Shipping lanes that would engulf multiple civilian communities to the ships' accompanying Sandia Laboratory-defined 2.2-mile radius Hazard Zones (a.k.a., "Zones of Concern");
- Overwhelming public opposition.
The new proposal made at an April 30 meeting recommended constructing a Mount Hope Bay water facility on the Rhode Island/ Massachusetts line. From there, the LNG [yes, cryogenic LNG not regasified LNG SPB webmaster] would be piped up the Taunton River along the remaining four miles to waiting tanks in Fall River.
Webmaster's Comments: This goofball idea defies logic, just as does the Quoddy Bay LNG project's proposed underwater cryogenic LNG pipeline.
Webmaster's Comments: Downeast LNG claims to have had some role in the original siting of the EcoElectrica LNG terminal; however unlike the Downeast LNG proposal EcoElectrica appears to adhere to the SIGTTO world-LNG terminal standards, when viewing the Puerto Rican terminal using Google Earth. The Downeast LNG terminal violates the SIGTTO standards for dozens of reasons. (See LNG Terminal Siting Standards Organization for an abbreviated summary of SIGTTO standards. See Save Passamaquoddy Bay's enumeration of Downeast LNG's violations, filed to the FERC docket.)
The Denali partners say they don't need the state's money.
Webmaster's Comments: Whatever company gets the go-ahead, the pipeline will put a huge dent in the already-declining need to import LNG into the US. More bad news keeps piling onto the Passamaquoddy Bay LNG proposals.
Randy Eresman, EnCana's president and CEO, said: "Recent exploration wells drilled by EnCana, its partners and industry, indicate these two resource plays hold the potential to eventually become amongst the largest in North America. [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 17)
Webmaster's Comments: These discoveries mean less need to import LNG, and more depressing news to Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG.
Steve Calderwood, an analyst with Raymond James in Calgary, said the amount of gas being found in places such as Horn River and Quebec is enough to lower gas prices and preclude the need for a pipeline from the Arctic. [Red bold emphasis added.] (Jun 17)
Webmaster's Comments: Even the natural gas industry indicates that there is less need to import LNG. Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG investors and developers must be sweating hard with worry and embarrassment.
Note, too, that these recent discoveries significantly reduce the argument for drilling off the Outer Continental Shelf, as being advocated by President Bush and Presidential hopeful John McCain. (See the following two stories, Bush asks Congress to end ban of US offshore drilling, and McCain would give states role in deciding on OCS development.)
Webmaster's Comments: In other words, Bush wants to undermine the investment of LNG terminal developers by reducing the need to import LNG. Realities in the natural gas industry, however, are proving both President Bush and the LNG industry wrong. (See above stories, EnCana reports commercial gas volumes in North American shale plays, and Shale discoveries lead natural gas revival.)
Webmaster's Comments: McCain, like President Bush, would undermine the investment of LNG terminal developers. The LNG industry must be wondering whose side those two are on, especially since LNG import need is seriously waning with the recent massive domestic natural gas discoveries. (See above stories, EnCana reports commercial gas volumes in North American shale plays, and Shale discoveries lead natural gas revival.)
17 Jun 2008 |
Eresman said new shale discoveries have "reversed the situation of decline" in North American gas supplies after similar announcements by Forest Oil, Apache Corp. and EOG Resources in recent months. [Red & bold emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: This further reduces the need for additional LNG imports, meaning even more bad news for already-mooted Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG.
Webmaster's Comments: "Domestic prices reaching the world market price" means higher natural gas prices. LNG is causing the cost of natural gas to rise significantly exactly the opposite of what the LNG developers tell the public.
Webmaster's Comments: The article's author, Cindy Hurst, a Lieutenant Commander in the US Navy Reserve, is a political-military research analyst with the Foreign Military Studies Office.
See SIGTTO.org, whose membership includes virtually the entire world LNG industry. SIGTTO's terminal siting standards publication, "Site Selection and Design for LNG Ports and Jetties," points out dozens of reasons why the Passamaquoddy Bay LNG proposals (Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG) are unfit for consideration the Passamaquoddy Bay waterway's unique attributes make it ineligible to pass SIGTTO's LNG siting standards.
Ignoring SIGTTO terminal siting standards endangers the LNG industry, civilians, and US energy security. FERC ignores SIGTTO, making the FERC process contrary to US energy and safety interests.
See LNG Terminal Siting Standards Organization for an abbreviated summary of SIGTTO terminal siting standards.
…others said strong gains in domestic gas production should lessen the need for LNG this year.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration expects U.S. natural gas production to jump 6 percent this year, or 3.2 bcf per day, primarily due to strong gains from deepwater Gulf of Mexico wells and unconventional supply sources like shale gas. [Red & bold emphasis added.] (Jun 13)
Webmaster's Comments: Domestic natural gas production is growing, offsetting the need for LNG imports.
Top
16 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: Canada grants a permit to construct an LNG import terminal before it grants a license to import LNG and export natural gas? The Canaport (Repsol-Irving partnership) LNG import terminal is 76% complete (99% offshore, 70% onshore), and is scheduled to be ready to operate near the end of this year.
15 Jun 2008 |
323-foot cargo ship passing under the Fore River Bridge in Quincy accidentally strikes the fendering system on the side of the bridge. With a so-called "docking master" directing vessel, the incident raises new questions about who should be in charge of ship docking and undocking in Boston and, more importantly, under what conditions.
Webmaster's Comments: This incident exemplifies how LNG ship navigation isn't the only navigational concern in the LNG waterway. Other vessels can collide (or allide[1]) with berthed LNG vessels if the LNG vessels aren't in a protected berth, well away from the ship transit fairway.
All three of the Passamaquoddy Bay LNG developers Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG are proposing to place their LNG ships' berths exposed near the transit fairway, where they could be struck by passing freighters or other vessels. This condition violates common sense, as well as the LNG industry's own terminal siting standards. (See LNG Terminal Siting Standards Organization.) If the world LNG industry considers it unsafe, FERC should consider it unsafe; however, FERC ignores the LNG industry's own safety standards, putting the industry, the public, and US energy security at risk.
[1] allide [nautical]; a moving vessel striking a stationary vessel or object.
Webmaster's Comments: The number of LNG-related deaths stated in the article doesn't attribute a source for that figure, and the number is undoubtedly not attributable to LNG. It is more likely to be attributable to natural gas pipelines.
According to NaturalGas.org, there are an average of seven deaths per year in the US from natural gas pipelines and distribution systems; however, according to the US Department of Transportation Office of Pipeline Safety, there are 15.5 fatalities/year on average related to natural gas distribution systems, and 2.8 fatalities/year on average related to natural gas transmission systems, totalling 18 fatalities/year.
FERC will treat us like peasants only if we allow ourselves to act like peasants
FERC is incapable of objectively analyzing this project. We must do our own analysis and make sure it isn't ignored. [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 12)
Webmaster's Comments: Rural populations are hit hardest by LNG projects, since they are less able to affort the terrific expense of the process. Local communities and state governments need to beat down FERC's abuses of pubic safety and the public interest and wrest the permitting power back into the hands of those who are most at risk from such projects.
The Daily Astorian's editorial analysis and moxy, in the defense of the local communities, are commendable.
12 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: This is the fourth new LNG terminal to be permitted, under construction, or already operating that will supply the Northeast, more than adequately satisfying the region's need for natural gas with US LNG imports declining makes the three projects in Passamaquoddy Bay frivolous pipe dreams.
“We do not have the assets required to do this job,” he said.
Webmaster's Comments: The Coast Guard states that they can't provide the required security. Even knowing that, FERC will approve the project, putting all the heat on the Coast Guard. Not only is the FERC process flawed, FERC doesn't treat its fellow federal cooperating agencies fairly.
Webmaster's Comments: Offshore LNG terminal siting is less vulnerable to the weather, has fewer security concerns, is more easily expandible, has easier and safer navigational approaches, and doesn't endanger civilian populations unlike the inappropriately sited Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG projects proposed for Passamaquoddy Bay.
US NATURAL GASConclusion Between January 2008 and the end of secondquarter 2009, 29 pipeline and LNG terminal projects are scheduled to be completed in and around the Southeast USGulf Coast. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: The US will be overwhelmed with LNG import capacity far more than the imported supplies of LNG.
And as such, there is need for an upgrade in local security systems, he said, to defend our position with regard to gas resources and exports. [Red emphasis added.]
GIANT UTILITIES
Analysts agreed
Webmaster's Comments: The players in Passamaquoddy Bay are small players attempting against all odds to be in a large-company business. As Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG sink, it's obvious the analysts are correct these three developers are in way over their heads.
11 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: Funny. Girdis didn't mention all the wasted time and money he and his Downeast LNG project caused to all parties by withdrawing from the state process after the Board of Environmental Protection conducted a week-long hearing on the project last July. Perhaps, by his pointing out such waste to Maine Government, Girdis is offering to reimburse everyone. Send your bills to:
Downeast LNG
PO Box 147
Robbinston, ME 04671And then there's Ian Emery, State Representative and part owner in the proposed Calais LNG project. Emery is in the political position of voting on LNG projects in Washington County and Maine a perfect example of conflict of interest in state government.
Hypocrisy abounds at all three LNG proposals in Passamaquoddy Bay.
Webmaster's Comments: Another big nail in the coffins of Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG a FOURTH permitted LNG terminal that will be supplying the Northeast, further mooting the Passamaquoddy Bay proposals.
The other three are Northeast Gateway, already in operation; Canaport, to be operating near the end of 2008; and Suez Neptune LNG, to be operational near the end of 2009.
MapleLNG intends to start operation in 2010.
Exxon Mobil hopes to build a $US1 billion terminal [BlueOcean Energy] off the New Jersey coast to receive and regasify liquefied natural gas [to supply New Jersey and New York]. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: Making New York dependent on energy from Russia? Exactly who is looking out for US energy security? …certainly not the US Government! FERC will rubber-stamp this project without batting an eye. [See related Gazprom articles, below, TransCanada bewildered by Gazprom's Alaska offer, and, Benchmark Cruel: $250?.]
Both companies operate at the LNG terminal on Elba Island, about five miles outside of Savannah. [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 7)
Times have changed. [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 10)
Webmaster's Comments: Gazprom, a Russian monopoly, is used to throwing its weight around. Should TransCanada be surprised by Gazprom's cavalier behavior? Should the US be inviting Gazprom to own US energy infrastructure as has already been done by the US State Department? Is that responsible energy security policy, or is it governmental negligence? [See related Gazprom articles, Benchmark Cruel: $250?, below, and, Exxon offers Gazprom LNG terminal deal, above.]
Webmaster's Comments: First of all, the WSA report mentioned in the press release is from OregonLNG to the Coast Guard not from the Coast Guard. Meaning, the project hasn't been assessed by the Coast Guard, and the report likely contains lots of pro-project spin that won't pass the Coast Guard's scrutiny.
On the other hand, the press release is correct in stating that, due to its location, this project presents a far lower hazard to the public than other projects in Oregon, although it does subject civilian populations to the 2.2-mile Sandia Hazard Zones ("Zones of Concern"). Therefore, OregonLNG violates one or more of the world LNG industry's terminal siting standards (see LNG Terminal Siting Standards Organization).
But gas prices in the Atlantic Basin are likely to soar and become more volatile because of increased gas demand and larger connectivity between the Americas and the European gas markets. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: Even more economic problems for Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG.
…LNG imports may decline 31% to 530 bcf in 2008…. [Red bold emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: Import capacity tripled actual imports halved.
There is no need for additional LNG import capacity as predicted in 2005 by FERC's then-Chairman Pat Wood, and as evidenced by the Northeast Gateway, Canaport, and Neptune import terminals.
The bad economic news keeps piling onto the Passamaquoddy Bay LNG projects. Industry members must be questioning Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG developer credibility. Who would hire them after this financial fiasco?
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) lowered its previously projected total of U.S. LNG imports for 2008 from 580 Bcf to 530 Bcf in its Short-Term Energy Outlook, which would represent a 240 Bcf decline from 2007's LNG import total. [Red & bold emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: Yes, the price differential between what is paid for LNG in the US and in Asia will diminish with significantly higher natural gas prices in the US.
Webmaster's Comments: Europe is seeking to reduce its reliance on Gazprom while the US State Department invites Gazprom to own US energy infrastructure. The State Department apparently doesn't believe that history repeats itself. [See related articles, above: TransCanada bewildered by Gazprom's Alaska offer, and Exxon offers Gazprom LNG terminal deal.]
Top
9 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: Downeast LNG is more guilty of waste of the Maine Board of Environmental Protection's, and intervenors', time and resources than Quoddy Bay LNG since Downeast LNG went through the official BEP hearing process, and then withdrew.
Downeast LNG and Quoddy Bay LNG are both economic pariahs to the Passamaquoddy Bay area and the State of Maine.
Webmaster's Comments: LNG terminal developers need to follow their industry's own safety guidelines for terminal siting (see LNG Terminal Siting Standards Organization), rather than the "site it anywhere and everywhere" policy currently endorsed by FERC. Jobs are aren't good when public safety is compromised.
Question: If the world LNG industry doesn't consider terminal siting conditions safe, why would FERC and the developer?
Answer: "Greed" and FERC catering to the rich and powerful.
But some experts are starting to question that idea, saying natural gas could be subject to the same explosion in overseas demand that has made oil so expensive. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: Realities are starting to settle in: Quoddy Bay LNG, Downeast LNG, and Calais LNG are economic dinosaurs with no future.
Webmaster's Comments: The US Coast Guard's WSR (Waterway Suitability Report) that is an integral part of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for this proposal already indicated the numerous problems that the applicant must overcome before the Coast Guard would approve the project. FERC knows about these problems, but is willing to ignore them in its permitting decision; and then, the heat will be on the Coast Guard, rather than FERC.
FERC is an unholy partner in the FERC-USCG Memorandum of Understanding as Cooperating Agencies on LNG project permitting. FERC isn't cooperating as it agreed to do.
"bitumen upgrades to capacity development . . . the capacity will likely be developed";
So, a "go" or "no go" decision for TransCanada is difficult.
Webmaster's Comments: That's another reason why Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG are stalled there's no reasonable expectation of receiving their required FERC permits.
8 Jun 2008 |
Ms. Harris said the company hopes to have gas flowing through the pipeline in early November.
FERC will hold the hearings June 24 in Bristol, R.I., and June 25 in Swansea, Mass. (Jun 7)
Webmaster's Comments: FERC thinks the US needs to import LNG all over the place, but exporting LNG to Japan is somehow okay, too. Truth be known, the US already has far more than sufficient permitted LNG import capacity, but FERC is unwilling to admit it, blindly empowering more import terminals.
Webmaster's Comments: "US energy security" and "Russian ownership" are mutually-exclusive concepts. Giving Russia or a Russian monopoly control of US energy infrastructure is extremely dangerous energy-security policy, bordering on negligence.
Webmaster's Comments: Likewise, the three LNG proposals for Passamaquoddy Bay threaten to kill lobster larvae and plankton that are essential to support other important species in the bay.
7 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: But, Downeast LNG after a week-long hearing process withdrew from the state process in an even more costly abuse of the process. This is a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black.
Webmaster's Comments: Offshore means no risk to civilian populations unlike the old-technology projects near people and communities being promoted in Passamaquoddy Bay.
Even the world LNG industry advocates locating LNG terminals where vapors from released LNG would not affect civilians (see SIGTTO). The industry is more concerned about safety than FERC.
Webmaster's Comments: Weaver's Cove's pre-filing "information" meeting follows the industry's strategy to a tee provide minimum information to divided groups of the public. The industry takes advantage of minimum FERC requirements, giving the air of informativeness while keeping the public ignorant of the facts.
Truths regarding FERC-required pre-filing open houses:
- Advertising the meetings to the public is not required.
- There are no minimum requirements regarding information to be provided to the public or to the format of the meeting.
- FERC presence is not required (and FERC certainly didn't attend the open house meetings for the Passamaquoddy Bay proposals), perhaps so FERC won't witness untruths being told by the applicants.
Webmaster's Comments: This is another proposal for an offshore terminal away from civilians.
Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG are behind the technology curve, and are ignoring civilian safety concerns that even the world LNG industry (SIGTTO) advocates observing:
- Some Eastport homes and part of Deer Island campground would be engulfed by LNG ships' Hazard Zone 1 (500 meters from the ship), the most dangerous of LNG ship Hazard Zones, where everyone would likely be killed in an LNG release.
- Downeast LNG and Quoddy Bay LNG would subject surrounding communities on both sides of the border to all three ships' Hazard Zones while the ships transited and were in port with Pleasant Point being in a permanent Hazard Zone, since Quoddy Bay LNG intends to have an LNG ship in port at all times.
- Calais LNG would subject more people than the other two projects to hazards, due to their longer transit up the same waterway. Plus, they would have a more difficult, winding passage, including passing very close to Saint Croix Island International Historic Site. Their docket ships would also present an "allision[1]" hazard to ship traffic from the Port of Bayside.
[1] Definition of "allision" a stationary ship or object being struck by a moving vessel; similar to "collision."
Since Dow depends on natural gas, small changes in the price of the feedstock can have a large affect on the company and the industry as a whole. Dow recently announced across-the-board increases, up to 20 percent, in the going rate for its products, citing the skyrocketing cost of feedstocks like natural gas. [Red & bold emphasis added.] (Jun 6)
Webmaster's Comments: Natural gas prices are skyrocketing bad for consumers.
Webmaster's Comments: Once again, FERC shows its contempt for civilian safety.
“It is just continued emphasis that FERC hasn’t really listened to Oregonians,” Krahe said.
Webmaster's Comments: LNG imports in April were a mere 30% of the previous April.
With gas prices at the UK National Balancing Point edging towards $13/MMBtu for July and rising well beyond that level for August and September, sellers are expecting Asian buyers to pay premiums of $2.50-3.00/MMBtu, translating into $16/MMBtu or higher for spot LNG, said traders. [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 6)
Webmaster's Comments: Foreign markets are driving the price of LNG significantly upward, driving up the price of natural gas to Americans contrary to the hype from LNG import terminal developers.
5 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: On the one hand FERC says we need to import more LNG; but, on the other hand the DOE says that exporting LNG is in the public interest. The right hand doesn't seem to know what the left is doing, exposing FERC hypocrisy and their catering to big energy, rather than attending to the public interest.
Project opponents have already criticized the document for omitting and minimizing project impacts.
Webmaster's Comments: Besides, the US Department of Energy has issued an opinion that exporting LNG is in the public interest (see story, above). With that being so, why the push to import additional LNG?
For instance, various documents sent to FERC cloud how exactly the company intends to keep threatened salmon from being swallowed into ships with ballast water. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: Similar issues exist with the three LNG proposals in Passamaquoddy Bay. Ballast water uptake and engine cooling water uptake amounting to as much as 50 million gallons per ship could do significant harm to Maine's lobster fishing industry, as well as to other fisheries.
Exxon has its own terminal, located on the Texas Gulf Coast, scheduled to open next year and has proposed building another off the New Jersey coast. [Red emphasis added.] (Jun 4)
Webmaster's Comments: Actual LNG players speak the truth about LNG market realities. On the other hand, Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG pretend they expect success with their ill-sited, ill-fated projects.
Webmaster's Comments: Article author Cindy Hurst is a political-military research analyst with the Foreign Military Studies Office. She is also a Lieutenant Commander in the United States Navy Reserve.
For the balance, "gas producers should also clearly voice their demands and proposals," Zhilin said.
3 Jun 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: CAPT McPherson will be the Captain of the Port for the LNG projects in Passamaquoddy Bay. McPherson follows CAPT Rendon, who succeeded CAPT Stephen Garrity after Garrity's retirement in 2007.
Just about the only place where demand for LNG seems not to be growing is the United States, an abrupt shift from expectations as little as one year ago. [Red emphasis added.] (May 29)
Webmaster's Comments: Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG terminal dreams are turning rapidly into nightmares.
Domestic gas supplies are indeed growing, but not sufficiently to fill storage, the analysts said. Meanwhile, liquefied natural gas imports "should grow moderately this year" but will nevertheless lag year-ago levels. [Red & bold emphasis added.] (May 30)
2 June 2008 |
Repsol Energy Canada Ltd. has already negotiated 25-year contracts to supply natural gas to U.S. customers. Its parent company, Spanish oil giant Repsol, has abundant supplies of natural gas committed to the project. All they're waiting for is the import and export licences. [Red emphasis added.] (May 31)
Webmaster's Comments: Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG have no LNG supplies and can't get them, since they have no permits. Even in the unlikely event that they could ever obtain all of the required permits, they would still be without LNG supply and without customers:
- The reality is that there isn't sufficient world LNG supply;
- Asia is willing to out-compete the US for LNG;
- Significant new natural gas discoveries have occurred in the US, reducing the need to import LNG;
- LNG imports into the US are down significantly (see NATS story, below); and
- The natural gas customers in northern New England will already be satisfying their increased natural gas needs via:
- Northeast Gateway import facility that just commenced importing LNG off Gloucester, MA;
- Canaport, that will be importing LNG around the end of this year; and
- Neptune deepwater port, also off Gloucester, MA, that will be accepting LNG around the end of 2009.
Simply put, the three LNG proposals for Passamaquoddy Bay make no economic sense for the industry, for investors, and for consumers creating real credibility issues for the project developers and their investors.
Webmaster's Comments: The same is true for the citizens battling LNG in Passamaquoddy Bay we're winning the battle against big money and their lawyers, who would despoil the bay and put the economy, civilian lives, and ways of life at risk.
Donate Now, or Make a Purchase to help Save Passamaquoddy Bay afford to win this battle.
Webmaster's Comments: FERC Chairman Kelliher claims, in his May 23 letter of response to Congressman Ruppensburger, states, “safety is our principle consideration in the review of proposed LNG terminals.” If that were actually true, FERC would be attending to the LNG industry’s own terminal siting standards (see SIGTTO and LNG Terminal Siting Standards Organization). Instead, FERC ignores those standards, confirming FERC's safety hypocrisy and endangering the industry, US energy security, and the public.
NATS reports today that the United States imported 29.7 Bcf of LNG during May 2008. [Red emphasis added.]
Webmaster's Comments: The US Energy Information Administration's yearly comparison of LNG imports by month from 19972008 discloses that the LNG import volumes were:
- 2007 May 94.319 Bcf [317% more than this year];
- 2006 May 67.271 Bcf [226% more than this year];
- 2005 May 52.628 Bcf [177% more than this year];
- 2004 May 53.162 Bcf [317% more than this year];
- 2003 May 45.814 Bcf [154% more than this year];
… indicating a precipitous drop in the US demand for, and availability of, LNG.
Webmaster's Comments: Actual LNG companies are recognizing what Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG must also be recognizing but are loathe to accept LNG isn't the opportunity that they've banked on.