Loading
|
|
"For much of the state of Maine, the environment is the economy" |
Listed here in Ascending Date Order by Date Posted to FERC eLibrary.
NOTE: The Docket List on the FERC website is in Date Order by Date Filed, rather than by Date Posted.
Color Key: | Project Developer, Contractors & Supporters Project Opponents Project Neutral Unknown, non-public comments |
2012 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | |
2011 | | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
2010 | |
2009 | | Dec | |
May 3 | Filed By: INDIVIDUAL [Marion Freeman] Summary: This Maine resident who has a lifelong connection with Passamaquoddy Bay and its communities argues there is no market justification for the Calais LNG project, since there is over 200-years' worth of domestic supply; that the project would harm the area; and that LNG would simply be adding reliance on another polluting fossil fuel. Information: FILE LIST |
May 5 | Filed By: INDIVIDUAL [A. Lee Sackett] Summary: This Saint Andrews resident enumerates why Calais LNG is inappropriately sited. Information: FILE LIST |
May 17 | Filed By: Calais LNG Project Company, LLC Summary: Calais LNG responds to FERC Office of Energy Projects Data Request regarding construction funds for the project. Information: FILE LIST |
May 19 | Filed By: INDIVIDUAL [Edward E. Michener] Summary: This non-intervenor opposes Calais LNG due to the economic and environmental harm it would impose. Information: FILE LIST |
May 20 | Filed By: INDIVIDUAL [Lucinda Flemer] Summary: This non-intervenor opposes Calais LNG due to lack of need, the added costs to communities, the harm it would do to neighboring communities, and in opposition to Goldman Sachs greed at the expense to the area. She also points out Government of Canada prohibition of LNG transits into Passamaquoddy Bay. Information: FILE LIST |
^Top